All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	chrisl@vmware.com, "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Subject: [PATCH] How to get number of physical CPU in linux from user space?
Date: 25 Oct 2002 15:09:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1035572950.1501.3429.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F2DBA543B89AD51184B600508B68D4000EA170E9@fmsmsx103.fm.intel.com>

On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 14:54, Nakajima, Jun wrote:

> Recent distributions or the AC tree has additional fields in
> /proc/cpu, which tell
> - physical package id
> - number of threads 

Attached patch for 2.5 adds the same fields the 2.4-ac tree have.  I
consider those "standard" enough.

Is this something HT users want?

	Robert Love

 proc.c |    5 +++++
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff -urN linux-2.5.44/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c
--- linux-2.5.44/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c	2002-10-19 00:02:29.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c	2002-10-25 15:06:23.000000000 -0400
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 	 * applications want to get the raw CPUID data, they should access
 	 * /dev/cpu/<cpu_nr>/cpuid instead.
 	 */
+	extern int phys_proc_id[NR_CPUS];
 	static char *x86_cap_flags[] = {
 		/* Intel-defined */
 	        "fpu", "vme", "de", "pse", "tsc", "msr", "pae", "mce",
@@ -74,6 +75,10 @@
 	/* Cache size */
 	if (c->x86_cache_size >= 0)
 		seq_printf(m, "cache size\t: %d KB\n", c->x86_cache_size);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	seq_printf(m, "physical processor ID\t: %d\n", phys_proc_id[n]);
+	seq_printf(m, "number of siblings\t: %d\n", smp_num_siblings);
+#endif
 	
 	/* We use exception 16 if we have hardware math and we've either seen it or the CPU claims it is internal */
 	fpu_exception = c->hard_math && (ignore_irq13 || cpu_has_fpu);


  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-25 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-25 18:54 How to get number of physical CPU in linux from user space? Nakajima, Jun
2002-10-25 19:09 ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-10-25 19:13   ` [PATCH] " Dave Jones
2002-01-16 19:35     ` Pavel Machek
2002-10-25 19:21     ` Robert Love
2002-10-25 20:03       ` chrisl
2002-10-25 21:13   ` Alan Cox
2002-10-25 19:12 ` chrisl
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-25 19:48 [PATCH] " Nakajima, Jun
2002-10-25 20:38 Nakajima, Jun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1035572950.1501.3429.camel@phantasy \
    --to=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=chrisl@vmware.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.