All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Magnus Sandberg <magnus@switchbeat.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] lvscan and df result differs
Date: Sat Oct 26 18:31:01 2002	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1035675002.11490.15.camel@sleep> (raw)

I have just installed lvm on my debian testing server.

I have finally managed to create a PV on a maxtor 
120G disk, the 'pvcreate' command complained about 
a partitiontable being present even if there is no 
table there.
--8<--
server:~# pvcreate --version
pvcreate: Logical Volume Manager 1.0.4
Heinz Mauelshagen, Sistina Software  02/05/2002 (IOP 10)
--8<--
I managed to get around that by using a v2 lvm command.
Is there a bug in 1.0.x's pvcreate?

I have also managed to create a VG a and a LV and that
seems to work. I have formatted the LV with ext3 and now
the strange thing is that lvscan reports:
--8<--
server:~# lvscan 
lvscan -- ACTIVE            "/dev/vg/lg" [114.49 GB]
lvscan -- 1 logical volumes with 114.49 GB total in 1 volume group
lvscan -- 1 active logical volumes
--8<--
But when using the filesystem df reports:
--8<--
Filesystem             Size   Used  Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hde1             123GB  121GB  2.4GB  99% /store
/dev/vg/lg            122GB  121GB      0 100% /store2
--8<--

/dev/hde1 is also a 120G disk but with resierfs, ext3
takeing up more size is probably normal. But the actual
size on the lvm is 122G and as you can see I can fit 
121G on the disk, so why is lvscan reporting ~115G? 
Can i safetly use my lvm setup without running the risk
of losing data?


Thanks,

/Magnus

             reply	other threads:[~2002-10-26 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-26 18:31 Magnus Sandberg [this message]
2002-10-28  3:07 ` [linux-lvm] lvscan and df result differs Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-10-28  9:24   ` Magnus Sandberg
2002-10-28  9:38     ` James Hawtin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1035675002.11490.15.camel@sleep \
    --to=magnus@switchbeat.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.