From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: Oops with in nfsd - 2.4.19-pre6 Date: 14 Nov 2002 12:46:51 -0500 Message-ID: <1037296011.20553.285.camel@tiny> References: <20021031210828.45F4A216991@server5.fastmail.fm> <1036099804.14984.165.camel@tiny> <20021112182949.45436c95.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> <1037211258.288.97.camel@tiny> <20021113194008.6dadeed5.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> <1037219001.21957.151.camel@tiny> <20021114170409.5f9b9108.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> <1037291572.287.277.camel@tiny> <20021114184153.3298a89b.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20021114184153.3298a89b.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Philippe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gramoull=E9?= Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com, jack@ucw.cz On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 12:41, Philippe Gramoull=E9 wrote: > | Now that I've looked at it, I think the only reject is that parisc-3= 2 > | already has one hunk applied, and x86-64 needs to have quotav2 suppo= rt > | added. Neither one affects i386, but I'll do some tests here. Jan,= am > | I missing something? >=20 > There was indeed some rejects in parisc-32 but there were lot more than t= hat. > Rejects were when applying reiserfs-quota-22.diff. > (using vanilla 2.4.20rc1 + ftp.suse.com:/pub/people/mason/patches/reiserf= s/quota-2.4/2.4.19 quota > patches) Those are conflicts between the reiserfs quota and the data logging.=20 But, I already have data-logging quota patches, so I'm only really worried about Jan's base quota patch. -chris