From: Luca Barbieri <ldb@ldb.ods.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] threading fix, tid-2.5.47-A3
Date: 17 Nov 2002 21:16:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1037564166.1597.119.camel@ldb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211172212001.18431-100000@localhost.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 628 bytes --]
> we broke binary compatibility several times, for the benefit of having a
> cleaner interface. Ulrich has no problems with this approach and NPTL is
> the only user of these interfaces currently. But i think you are one of
> the few peoples who are running an NPTL system (ie. with the new
> NPTL-glibc actually installed as the default system glibc) - is binary
> compatibility important to you for this specific case?
No, but since I don't see any advantage in breaking it (other than a
more aesthetically pleasing header), why break it?
The problem is just the numbering of the flags, not the new
functionality.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-17 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3DD7E3E7.6040403@redhat.com>
2002-11-17 18:54 ` [patch] threading fix, tid-2.5.47-A3 Linus Torvalds
2002-11-17 20:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-17 20:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-17 19:54 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-17 21:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-17 20:16 ` Luca Barbieri [this message]
2002-11-17 21:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-17 20:35 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-17 20:44 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-17 20:49 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-17 22:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-17 23:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-17 23:23 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-18 1:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-18 3:33 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-18 3:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-18 3:58 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-18 4:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-18 4:31 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-18 6:46 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-18 16:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-18 8:07 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-18 8:21 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-18 8:27 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-18 9:30 ` [patch] threading enhancements, tid-2.5.47-C0 Ingo Molnar
2002-11-18 8:29 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-18 12:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-18 12:11 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-20 1:40 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-20 1:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-20 3:37 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-20 4:04 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-20 21:55 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-20 22:11 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-20 23:26 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-20 23:28 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-21 0:18 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-21 9:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-21 12:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-21 0:37 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-20 8:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-20 9:51 ` [patch] threading enhancements, tid-2.5.48-A1 Ingo Molnar
2002-11-20 8:41 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-20 20:20 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-21 18:03 ` [patch] threading enhancements, tid-2.5.48-C0 Ingo Molnar
2002-11-21 19:30 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-18 8:30 ` [patch] threading fix, tid-2.5.47-A3 Luca Barbieri
2002-11-18 12:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-18 12:50 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-18 12:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-18 13:20 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-18 13:03 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-18 16:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-18 16:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-18 1:46 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-18 3:40 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-18 22:22 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-17 23:37 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-17 12:40 Ingo Molnar
2002-11-17 11:57 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-17 13:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-17 13:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-17 13:29 ` Luca Barbieri
2002-11-17 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-17 19:03 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-11-17 19:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-17 19:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-17 18:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-17 20:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-17 20:01 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1037564166.1597.119.camel@ldb \
--to=ldb@ldb.ods.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.