From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Josefsson Subject: Re: -m helper --helper pptp ? Date: 25 Nov 2002 16:35:21 +0100 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1038238521.14752.407.camel@tux> References: <4710803634.20021125114458@wp.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4710803634.20021125114458@wp.pl> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Tomasz Wrona Cc: netfilter@lists.samba.org On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 11:44, Tomasz Wrona wrote: > Hi, > > How do You think, is it valid to use such a match case ? > > -m helper --helper pptp > -m helper --helper h323 > > Personaly I used it but I have never seen if this rules had counted > anything. -m helper --helper pptp That should work given you have the ip_conntrack_pptp module loaded (or compiled into your kernel) -m helper --helper h323 That will _not_ work. h323 is just the name of a collection of other protocols that run inside each other. The primary controlchannel can be matched with H.225 and the data-channels can be matched with H.245 (case-sensitive!) -- /Martin Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.