From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:49:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:49:22 -0500 Received: from [217.167.51.129] ([217.167.51.129]:24002 "EHLO zion.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:49:21 -0500 Subject: Re: patch for aty128fb.c From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: James Simmons Cc: Paul Mackerras , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 11 Dec 2002 19:01:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1039629716.3539.51.camel@zion> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 15:42, James Simmons wrote: > > > Currently it can only put one rage 128 chip to sleep, but that is ok > > for now since I've never seen a laptop with two rage 128 chips yet. :) > > The generic device model will ultimately give us a better way to > > handle sleep/wakeup. > > Actually I started to looking into doing that. I noticed struct > pci_driver having a resume and suspend function. Is this related? I just > started to looking into the new PM code. It's +/- related, but pls don't play with that now, I need to dig into it in much details myself, I don't think I'll use the pci callbacks anyway. Ben.