From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com>
Cc: "'Till Immanuel Patzschke'" <tip@inw.de>,
lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?!
Date: 18 Dec 2002 20:13:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1040260387.855.95.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A46BBDB345A7D5118EC90002A5072C7806CACA2C@orsmsx116.jf.intel.com>
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 20:04, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote:
> >
> > forgot the kernel version (2.4.20aa1)...
>
> You need the O(1) scheduler; not sure if aa has it or not; if not, lots of
> processes will suck your machine. I think -ac has the O(1) scheduler, or try
> 2.5. The old scheduler is pretty cool but not as scalable as the new one.
>
> If it has it ... well, I have no idea - maybe Robert Love would
> know.
2.4-aa has the O(1) scheduler, yes.
I think 15,000 processes may always suck, though :)
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-19 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-19 1:04 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2002-12-19 1:13 ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-12-19 2:31 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-19 1:58 ` Rik van Riel
2002-12-19 2:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-19 0:46 Till Immanuel Patzschke
2002-12-19 0:53 ` Till Immanuel Patzschke
2002-12-19 1:15 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 1:12 ` David Lang
2002-12-19 1:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 1:20 ` David Lang
2002-12-19 1:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 1:42 ` Robert Love
2002-12-19 1:44 ` David Lang
2002-12-19 0:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-12-19 1:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 14:59 ` Denis Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1040260387.855.95.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tip@inw.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.