From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brad Hubbard Subject: Re: Weekly performance meeting APAC time? Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 21:37:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <104170944.77164509.1463621856704.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <20160518190828.GC22208@predictor> <09a57ed5-d9b4-d599-ddd3-a3b3496dd9c5@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.24]:60314 "EHLO mx3-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751420AbcESBhk convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2016 21:37:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <09a57ed5-d9b4-d599-ddd3-a3b3496dd9c5@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Nelson Cc: Piotr =?utf-8?Q?Da=C5=82ek?= , ceph-devel ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Nelson" > To: "Piotr Da=C5=82ek" > Cc: "ceph-devel" > Sent: Thursday, 19 May, 2016 7:18:14 AM > Subject: Re: Weekly performance meeting APAC time? >=20 > On 05/18/2016 02:08 PM, Piotr Da=C5=82ek wrote: > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:41:36AM -0500, Mark Nelson wrote: > >> Josh mentioned at today's performance meeting that the current > >> 8:00AM PST time is inconvenient for some folks he's talked with th= at > >> live in the APAC region who would like to attend. I'd like to fin= d > >> out how many other folks feel this way as well? Would folks be > >> interested in staggering the meeting every other week with somethi= ng > >> like a 6:00PM PST (9:00AM Beijing) next day) time? > > > > This means 3:00 AM for everyone in CET and 2:00 AM in GMT... Well, > > cant't satisfy everyone I guess. > > >=20 > Yeah, that's what I'm concerned about. Even if we did it, it would o= nly > be every other week. First I want to see how many people respond say= ing > they would even like this change though. I was actually the driver behind this I think. Primarily I just wanted = to discuss a project I'm working on and get some feedback from the perf te= am. The regular scheduled meeting is at 0100 my time so I raised that as a bit = of an issue (soft, I know :) ). I think any modification to the meeting time = though needs to be proportional so maybe 1 in 4 is more appropriate? I guess i= t depends on the level of interest here in the APAC region which you are = trying to gauge. For me this is probably more of a one off than an ongoing com= mitment to attending the meeting. While we are at it I noticed that http://pad.ceph.com/p/performance_wee= kly does not seem to include any recordings from this year although each me= eting entry says "See recording...". Are these archived somewhere else or may= be the dates are incorrect? Cheers, Brad >=20 > Mark > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel"= in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >=20 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html