All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: choice of raid5 checksumming algorithm wrong ?
Date: 11 Jan 2003 07:26:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1042266405.14440.54.camel@sun> (raw)

Hi!

I really do wonder whether the displayed message is wrong or why it
always chooses the slowest checksumming function (happens with 2.4.19 -
21pre3)

2.4.20:
Jan  7 18:32:22 sun kernel: raid5: measuring checksumming speed
Jan  7 18:32:22 sun kernel: 8regs     :  3054.400 MB/sec
Jan  7 18:32:22 sun kernel: 32regs    :  2696.800 MB/sec
Jan  7 18:32:22 sun kernel: pIII_sse  :  1614.000 MB/sec
Jan  7 18:32:22 sun kernel: pII_mmx   :  4672.000 MB/sec
Jan  7 18:32:22 sun kernel: p5_mmx    :  5984.000 MB/sec
Jan  7 18:32:22 sun kernel: raid5: using function: pIII_sse (1614.000 MB/sec)

21pre2:
Jan  5 19:18:47 sun kernel: raid5: measuring checksumming speed
Jan  5 19:18:47 sun kernel: 8regs     :  3054.000 MB/sec
Jan  5 19:18:47 sun kernel: 32regs    :  2697.200 MB/sec
Jan  5 19:18:47 sun kernel: pIII_sse  :  2574.000 MB/sec
Jan  5 19:18:47 sun kernel: pII_mmx   :  4671.600 MB/sec
Jan  5 19:18:47 sun kernel: p5_mmx    :  5984.000 MB/sec
Jan  5 19:18:47 sun kernel: raid5: using function: pIII_sse (2574.000 MB/sec)
Jan  5 19:18:47 sun kernel: md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27


21pre3:
Jan  7 21:38:12 sun kernel: raid5: measuring checksumming speed
Jan  7 21:38:12 sun kernel: 8regs     :  3055.200 MB/sec
Jan  7 21:38:12 sun kernel: 32regs    :  2697.200 MB/sec
Jan  7 21:38:12 sun kernel: pIII_sse  :  5658.400 MB/sec
Jan  7 21:38:12 sun kernel: pII_mmx   :  4672.400 MB/sec
Jan  7 21:38:12 sun kernel: p5_mmx    :  5984.800 MB/sec
Jan  7 21:38:12 sun kernel: raid5: using function: pIII_sse (5658.400 MB/sec)

it is always the same system...athlon xp2.4+...
Soeren.


             reply	other threads:[~2003-01-11  6:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-11  6:26 Soeren Sonnenburg [this message]
2003-01-11 15:45 ` choice of raid5 checksumming algorithm wrong ? Lionel Bouton
2003-01-11 19:39   ` Rene Rebe
2003-01-11 19:52     ` Soeren Sonnenburg
2003-01-11 20:20       ` Rene Rebe
2003-01-12 14:44         ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-01-12 16:14           ` Rene Rebe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1042266405.14440.54.camel@sun \
    --to=kernel@nn7.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.