From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sander Eikelenboom Subject: Re: Linux kernel summit 2010 topic: "Xen, in or out" (Greg KH) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:23:30 +0200 Message-ID: <104334708.20101019122330@eikelenboom.it> References: <686531435.20101019111929@eikelenboom.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: Dan Magenheimer , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Tuesday, October 19, 2010, 12:09:45 PM, you wrote: > On 19/10/2010 10:19, "Sander Eikelenboom" wrote: >>> Iirc Konrad wrote he's going there.. >>> Sounds like some Xen people definitely should be there :) >>=20 >>> -- Pasi >>=20 >>=20 >> Perhaps someone more into the hypervisor side of things (Keir?) could be= wise >> too ? > Attendance at the kernel summit is by invitation only. Ahh i see that complicates it a bit :-) Although an email to Greg KH if there could be any need from responses from= within Xen on the points discussed could lead to something ? On the other hand perhaps the kernel folks should first agree on what they = think ... I don't know if Jeremy goes ? He seems to be on the "potential invitation l= ist". > -- Keir >> I could imagine a discussion could go to how much Xen hypervisor wise has >> to/could change to make the kernel changes more clean and less intrusive= , as >> that seems to be the old discussion that keeps popping up from time to t= ime. >> It also seems people are hesitant to get the patches in mainline because= there >> doesn't seems to be much of an outline of what will come after the first >> perhaps less intrusive patches and fear there could be some crap later t= hat is >> less easy to refuse since a part is allready in. >> Any willingness and vision on that part could reduce the hesitation to i= nclude >> Xen patches in mainline i think. >>=20 >> -- >>=20 >> Sander >>=20 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel --=20 Best regards, Sander mailto:linux@eikelenboom.it