From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: no reiserfs quota in 2.4 yet? 2.4.21-pre4-ac4 says different Date: 19 Feb 2003 20:10:11 -0500 Message-ID: <1045703410.16042.70.camel@tiny.suse.com> References: <20030217183957.O1284@humilis> <1045504527.2182.415.camel@tiny.suse.com> <20030219134842.GB7138@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20030219234024.N20771@humilis> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20030219234024.N20771@humilis> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: ookhoi@humilis.net Cc: Jan Kara , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 17:40, Ookhoi wrote: > > Alan has needed changes to generic quota code already in his patchset > > so probably just leaving out these changes should make everything work > > (but I haven't tested it recently). > > You mean, I should use only a few of these? > > 01-quota-v2-2.4.20.diff Not this, -ac already has it > 02-nesting-2.4.20.diff > 03-reiserfs-quota-23-2.4.20.diff Or these two, I've got an updated reiserfs-quota patch on top of the data logging code in testing here, it should apply more cleanly on -ac. The big delay right now is I'm trying to fix another latency bug in data=ordered support, and test the fix for the sd_block count on symlinks. > 04-kinoded-8-2.4.20.diff > > I'm afraid they don't apply cleanly, though I might just need to try a > bit harder. > > OTOH, there must be a reason that Chris _works_ on it ;-) (eg, > non-trivial) > > Anyway, I have the following wishes (yeah, it is not even Christmas!): > > o quota in -ac patches for reiser (like the Configure help already > says ;-) I doubt I'll send it to Alan, keeping up with vanilla and the suse kernels is hard enough ;-) If someone wants to actively work with me on maintaining them in the ac tree, drop me a private message and we should be able to work something out. -chris