All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc@linuxweasel.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Soft-/Hardware RAID Performance
Date: 20 Feb 2003 10:31:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1045765895.2116.2.camel@gregdell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20030220112347.028ef5c0@195.90.31.33>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1143 bytes --]

On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 02:55, Daniel Brockhaus wrote:
[snip]
> One suggestion to speed up the reads was to issue several reads in 
> parallel. Silly me didn't think of that, I was completely focused on the 
> writes, which are more important for my application. Anyway. Using parallel 
> reads (from four processes), read performance scales almost with the number 
> of disks in the array. This goes for both, hardware and software RAID, with 
> software RAID being about 15% faster.
> 
> Write performance on the other hand does not change at all when using 
> multiple processes - for obvious reasons: The kernel queues, sorts and 
> merges write requests anyway, so the number of processes doing the writes 
> does not matter. But I've noticed something peculiar: If I change my 
> benchmark to write 4K blocks at 4K boundaries, write performance increases 
> to almost 300%. This is quite logical, since the kernel can write a 'page 

What was your previous benchmark write size?  And what parameters did
you use when creating the RAID 0 array and filesystem?  There may be
opportunities for tuning there.
	Greg
[snip]

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-20 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-19 19:56 Soft-/Hardware RAID Performance Daniel Brockhaus
2003-02-20  0:03 ` Neil Brown
2003-02-20 10:55 ` Daniel Brockhaus
2003-02-20 18:31   ` Gregory Leblanc [this message]
2003-02-21  0:08   ` Neil Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1045765895.2116.2.camel@gregdell \
    --to=gleblanc@linuxweasel.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.