From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Wittenberg <daniel-wittenberg@starken.com>
Subject: Re: [SPAM-RATING-1] Re: equalize traffic when link is down
Date: 08 Mar 2003 01:40:41 -0600
Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
Message-ID: <1047109241.1990.85.camel@runabout.noc.starken.com>
References: <1047107185.2050.62.camel@runabout.noc.starken.com> 
	<045101c2e547$c8e84860$13fcc5cb@Housecall>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <045101c2e547$c8e84860$13fcc5cb@Housecall>
Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Netfilter <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>

Ok, makes sense, so if we just drop the cache timeout (don't remember if
you can configure that or not) then we can adjust the "switch-over" time
in case the default is too high.

Great, thanks!
Dan

On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 01:53, hare ram wrote:
> Hi
> 
> AFAIK,
> 
> If the First Link down, the total traffic will move to Other Second  Link,
> if you are configure and load balancing the Link
> 
> If you make the static routes , them the traffic will be dead
> 
> If you made the Loadbalance the both the  links,
>  then it  will take some time to clear the routecache, once fresh route
> cache build you will have the fresh routes,
> so all the traffic will move towards active link.
> 
> 
> hare