From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT_META doesn't work properly
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 21:47:04 +0100
Message-ID: <10474963.UjXCaseS66@xps13>
References: <1424449505.129655495@f327.i.mail.ru>
 <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891263231B304@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, imustafin-5URONGGNgjI@public.gmane.org
Return-path: <dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891263231B304-kPTMFJFq+rEMvF1YICWikbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>

2015-02-20 19:26, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of ?????? ????????
> > Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 4:25 PM
> > To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT_META doesn't work
> > properly
> > 
> >  Hi, list!
> > 
> > RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT_META option in rte_pipeline library doesn't
> > work for non-default table entries. Is this bug or correct behaviour?
> > 
> > This is my patch, that changes this behaviour:
> > 
> > --- a/lib/librte_pipeline/rte_pipeline.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_pipeline/rte_pipeline.c
> > @@ -999,8 +999,10 @@ rte_pipeline_compute_masks(struct rte_pipeline
> > *p, uint64_t pkts_mask)
> >  {
> >         p->action_mask1[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_DROP] = 0;
> >         p->action_mask1[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT] = 0;
> > +    p->action_mask1[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT_META] = 0;
> >         p->action_mask1[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_TABLE] = 0;
> > 
> > +
> >         if ((pkts_mask & (pkts_mask + 1)) == 0) {
> >                 uint64_t n_pkts = __builtin_popcountll(pkts_mask);
> >                 uint32_t i;
> > @@ -1224,6 +1226,7 @@ rte_pipeline_run(struct rte_pipeline *p)
> >                 pkts_mask = RTE_LEN2MASK(n_pkts, uint64_t);
> >                 p->action_mask0[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_DROP] = 0;
> >                 p->action_mask0[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT] = 0;
> > +        p->action_mask0[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT_META] = 0;
> >                 p->action_mask0[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_TABLE] = 0;
> > 
> >                 /* Input port user actions */
> > @@ -1300,6 +1303,9 @@ rte_pipeline_run(struct rte_pipeline *p)
> >                                 p->action_mask0[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT] |=
> >                                         p->action_mask1[
> >                                                 RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT];
> > +                p->action_mask0[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT_META] |=
> > +                    p->action_mask1[
> > +                        RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT_META];
> >                                 p->action_mask0[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_TABLE] |=
> >                                         p->action_mask1[
> >                                                 RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_TABLE];
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks, Ildar
> 
> Acked by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

No Cristian, you cannot ack this patch, even if it fixes the problem.
The format is not OK: indent is wrong and it's not signed.
Please Ildar, check http://dpdk.org/dev#send to know how to submit a patch.

> Thank you, Ildar!