From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@clear.net.nz>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: akpm@digeo.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't refill pcp lists during SWSUSP.
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:06:20 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1047981979.2206.3.camel@laptop-linux.cunninghams> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030318081809.GB10472@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Hi Pavel.
You need to remember that this is infrastructure for later. I tried it
other ways and would have needed a number of calls to drain local pages.
Perhaps I'm taking the wrong approach, trying to feed a patch at a time
when you can't see how it all fits together. If you like, I'll send a
'whole kit and caboodle' patch as soon as I get the last bugs ironed
out. I have it suspending and resuming at the moment, but have one last
bug to iron out that's stopping me getting back from
do_suspend_lowlevel. It's just a matter of time, and then that will be
fixed. I could send you a monster patch then :> (I'll be posting it
somewhere anyway - I'll want others to test it, of course).
Regards,
Nigel
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 20:18, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Here's another patch (the last for a little while, I promise!). It stops
> > the pcp lists from being refilled while SWSUSP is running. Despite the
> > comment in the page, drain_local_pages does only need to get called once
> > right now, but I have patches coming that will (DV) change that. This
> > patch is thus groundwork for them.
>
> This adds external (and pretty ugly) dependency of swsusp on the
> outside. And as it still needs to drain_local_pages(), nothing is
> gained. I believe it is better to just call drain_local_pages few
> times. Magic hooks "if suspending, don't do this" seem like wrong
> approach to me.
>
> Pavel
--
Nigel Cunningham
495 St Georges Road South, Hastings 4201, New Zealand
Be diligent to present yourself approved to God as a workman who does
not need to be ashamed, handling accurately the word of truth.
-- 2 Timothy 2:14, NASB.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-18 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-17 23:56 [PATCH] Don't refill pcp lists during SWSUSP Nigel Cunningham
2003-03-18 0:05 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-18 5:27 ` Nigel Cunningham
[not found] ` <20030317222018.5c7f7a56.akpm@digeo.com>
2003-03-18 6:35 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-03-18 6:40 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-03-18 8:18 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-18 10:06 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2003-03-18 16:58 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1047981979.2206.3.camel@laptop-linux.cunninghams \
--to=ncunningham@clear.net.nz \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.