From: Fonyuy-Asheri Caleb <fonyuy-asheri.caleb@inria.fr>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: file xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h: Meaning of CPUID constants
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 10:45:59 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1049993614.4894172.1714985159910.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZjiWDMXFNmwSzAxQ@macbook>
> From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> To: "Fonyuy-Asheri Caleb" <fonyuy-asheri.caleb@inria.fr>
> Cc: "xen-devel" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2024 10:34:20 AM
> Subject: Re: file xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h: Meaning of CPUID constants
> On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:46:58AM +0200, Fonyuy-Asheri Caleb wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am currently doing a study on the way xen handles CPUID information.
>>
>> I came across these constants in the code (xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h
>> file) but no explanation of why they have been set that way.
>>
>> #define CPUID_GUEST_NR_BASIC (0xdu + 1)
>> #define CPUID_GUEST_NR_CACHE (5u + 1)
>> #define CPUID_GUEST_NR_FEAT (2u + 1)
>> #define CPUID_GUEST_NR_TOPO (1u + 1)
>> #define CPUID_GUEST_NR_XSTATE (62u + 1)
>> #define CPUID_GUEST_NR_EXTD_INTEL (0x8u + 1)
>> #define CPUID_GUEST_NR_EXTD_AMD (0x21u + 1)
>>
>> Please can someone explain to me why we have these constants or point to a
>> documentation which explains it?
>> I am particularly interested in the CPUID_GUEST_NR_BASIC given that for intel
>> processors for example, we have
>> basic leaves running up to 0x21u already for recent processors. This value sort
>> of forces a particular max leaf value.
>
> This is related to the maximum leaves supported in the cpu_policy
> structure:
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/xen/latest/source/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h#L122
>
> For basic leaves (0x000000xx) we support up to leaf 0xd (XSTATE). It
> doesn't mean there are no further leaves behind it, but we likely
> still have no use for them, and hence they are not part of the policy.
> The cpu-policy is used to store a (cpuid) policy object for guests,
> so if the information exposed in those leaves are related to features
> that are never exposed to guests is makes no sense to have space for
> them.
So if I understand you well, you mean before extending this, we need to perform a study on the
leaves to confirm how useful they are to the guests depending on the cpu information they carry.
>
> Regards, Roger.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-06 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-06 7:46 file xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpu-policy.h: Meaning of CPUID constants Fonyuy-Asheri Caleb
2024-05-06 8:13 ` Jan Beulich
2024-05-06 8:34 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-05-06 8:45 ` Fonyuy-Asheri Caleb [this message]
2024-05-06 8:47 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1049993614.4894172.1714985159910.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr \
--to=fonyuy-asheri.caleb@inria.fr \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.