From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263227AbTDLKOI (for ); Sat, 12 Apr 2003 06:14:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263228AbTDLKOI (for ); Sat, 12 Apr 2003 06:14:08 -0400 Received: from smtp2.clear.net.nz ([203.97.37.27]:26278 "EHLO smtp2.clear.net.nz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263227AbTDLKOI (for ); Sat, 12 Apr 2003 06:14:08 -0400 Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 22:29:57 +1200 From: Nigel Cunningham Subject: Re: Completely new idea to virtual memory In-reply-to: <200304120554_MC3-1-341A-4160@compuserve.com> To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Cc: John Bradford , Linux Kernel Mailing List Message-id: <1050143397.5715.11.camel@laptop-linux.cunninghams> Organization: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <200304120554_MC3-1-341A-4160@compuserve.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 21:52, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > o if swsusp does not need to write already-backed pages it could > reduce suspend time Hmmm. Not sure if it's worth the time taken to code & run figuring out if it's already backed, though :>. Would we ever be talking about a significant proportion of pages? Regards, Nigel