From: "Shaheed R. Haque" <srhaque@iee.org>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6?
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 09:30:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1050222609.3e992011e4f54@netmail.pipex.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1050177751.2291.468.camel@localhost>
Quoting Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>:
> We strive for simple interfaces here in Linux :)
>
> If you want to give them exclusive access, you need to bind all the
> other processes to the other processors. One easy way to do this is to
> have init bind itself elsewhere on boot.
Interesting idea. AFAICS, this involves either changing the code of /sbin/init
to set its affinity to a default cpu mask (provided by a kernel boot flag, I
presume), or using taskset-like functionality and then hoping that all current
shells etc. die before the programs I care about start.
Would it not be better to simply have the kernel use the boot flag directly as
the default CPU mask setting?
[ I can see the argument that "if you need such control, you should set up your
distro to deal with it", but that is a level of tweaking I would like to avoid
for my customers ]
Thanks, Shaheed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-13 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-12 11:20 Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6? Shaheed R. Haque
2003-04-12 12:11 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-12 12:24 ` Antonio Vargas
2003-04-12 14:54 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-12 18:23 ` Robert Love
2003-04-12 19:56 ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-04-12 20:02 ` Robert Love
2003-04-13 8:30 ` Shaheed R. Haque [this message]
2003-04-13 14:28 ` Robert Love
2003-05-13 11:49 ` 2.6 must-fix list, v2 Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-13 20:02 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-13 22:46 ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-14 2:42 ` Steven Cole
2003-05-14 11:49 ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-14 13:08 ` Steven Cole
2003-05-13 22:49 ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-14 11:02 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-05-14 15:59 ` Robert Love
2003-05-14 16:04 ` Robert Love
2003-05-14 21:01 ` shaheed
2003-05-14 21:15 ` Robert Love
2003-05-15 9:19 ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-15 15:32 ` Robert Love
2003-05-15 20:07 ` shaheed
2003-05-15 20:20 ` Robert Love
2003-05-15 20:24 ` Robert Love
2003-05-15 21:30 ` shaheed
2003-04-13 3:52 ` Re: Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6? Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-15 11:39 ` [HOWTO] Emulate processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6 \"shaheed r. haque\"
2003-04-14 22:40 ` [RFC] patch to allow CPUs to be reserved to callers of sys_setaffinity [was Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6?] shaheed
2003-05-01 20:19 ` Working .config for a Dell 2650 for 2.5.6x? (was Re: Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6?) shaheed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1050222609.3e992011e4f54@netmail.pipex.net \
--to=srhaque@iee.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.