From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264309AbTDOFwr (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 01:52:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264311AbTDOFwr (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 01:52:47 -0400 Received: from [196.41.29.142] ([196.41.29.142]:41724 "EHLO workshop.saharact.lan") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264309AbTDOFwq (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 01:52:46 -0400 Subject: Re: Oops: ptrace fix buggy From: Martin Schlemmer To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Cc: James Bourne , Ken Brownfield , Marc-Christian Petersen , KML In-Reply-To: <20030414185806.GA12740@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <200304121154.32997.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> <20030414134603.GB10347@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <1050330667.4059.27.camel@workshop.saharact.lan> <20030414144709.GE10347@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <1050343825.4757.17.camel@nosferatu.lan> <20030414185806.GA12740@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Organization: Message-Id: <1050386416.4061.31.camel@workshop.saharact.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3- Date: 15 Apr 2003 08:00:17 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 20:58, Jörn Engel wrote: > So basically, neither the existing EXTRAVERSION nor my new FIXLEVEL > are checked. Any code could potentially break with -ac1 to -ac2 or > with .1 to .2. > > Did anyone experience such problems with -ac already? There are far > more changes in -ac than there are in your patch. > No, -ac[12] do not break. Its only when you have something like 2.4.20.1 (ie. three '.' s). -- Martin Schlemmer