From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262680AbTDUXYn (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 19:24:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262682AbTDUXYn (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 19:24:43 -0400 Received: from pointblue.com.pl ([62.89.73.6]:46345 "EHLO pointblue.com.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262680AbTDUXYl (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 19:24:41 -0400 Subject: Re: grsecurity in 2.5? From: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz To: Chris Wright Cc: lkml In-Reply-To: <20030421143849.A11883@figure1.int.wirex.com> References: <20030421212501.GA30266@kroah.com> <20030421143849.A11883@figure1.int.wirex.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: K4 labs Message-Id: <1050968186.3065.16.camel@flat41> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 22 Apr 2003 00:36:26 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2003-04-21 at 22:38, Chris Wright wrote: > * Zoltan NAGY (nagyz@piarista-kkt.sulinet.hu) wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > What's the status of that patch being ported to the LSM interface (which > > > is already in 2.5)? > > > > AFAIK there was a discussion about it, but i dont know what decision has > > born.. > > I don't think the grsecurity developers are motivated to port their work > to LSM. Patches are welcome of course ;-) Maybe we should start to bring them piece by piece, fe. PaX first and others. Question is not that will somebody do that, i am sure of that - grsec is needed in 2.4 - and it will be needed in 2.6. Question is, if it will be included in mainstream kernel release ? -- Grzegorz Jaskiewicz K4 labs