From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>,
Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] support for sysfs string based properties for SCSI (1/3)
Date: 05 May 2003 12:08:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1052154516.1888.33.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030505170202.GA1296@kroah.com>
On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 12:02, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2003 at 02:19:23PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > diff -Nru a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> > --- a/drivers/base/core.c Sat May 3 14:18:21 2003
> > +++ b/drivers/base/core.c Sat May 3 14:18:21 2003
> > @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
> >
> > if (dev_attr->show)
> > ret = dev_attr->show(dev,buf);
> > + else if (dev->bus->show)
> > + ret = dev->bus->show(dev, buf, attr);
> > return ret;
>
> Can't you do this by using the class interface instead?
I don't know, I haven't digested the class interface patches yet, since
they just appeared this morning.
> This also forces you to do a lot of string compares within the bus show
> function (as your example did) which is almost as unwieldy as just
> having individual show functions, right? :)
Nothing prevents users from doing it the callback way. However,
callbacks aren't a scaleable interface for properties that have to be
shared and overridden.
I agree string compares are unwieldy (and smack of XML), so I'm open to
suggestions of a better way of doing it that has the same flexibility of
the string method...
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-05 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-03 19:11 [RFC] support for sysfs string based properties for SCSI (1/3) James Bottomley
2003-05-03 19:19 ` James Bottomley
2003-05-03 19:25 ` [RFC] support for sysfs string based properties for SCSI (2/3) James Bottomley
2003-05-03 19:30 ` [RFC] support for sysfs string based properties for SCSI (3/3) James Bottomley
2003-05-05 17:02 ` [RFC] support for sysfs string based properties for SCSI (1/3) Greg KH
2003-05-05 17:08 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2003-05-05 17:17 ` Greg KH
2003-05-05 20:08 ` Mike Anderson
2003-05-06 0:05 ` James Bottomley
2003-05-13 21:02 ` Patrick Mochel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1052154516.1888.33.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.