All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Saout <christophe@saout.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Pfiffer <andyp@osdl.org>
Subject: ext3/lilo/2.5.6[89] (was: [KEXEC][2.5.69] kexec for 2.5.69 available)
Date: 09 May 2003 22:04:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1052510656.6334.8.camel@chtephan.cs.pocnet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1052507057.15923.31.camel@andyp.pdx.osdl.net>

Am Fre, 2003-05-09 um 21.04 schrieb Andy Pfiffer:

> [...]
>  I had an unrelated
> delay in posting this due to some strange behavior of late with LILO and
> my ext3-mounted /boot partition (/sbin/lilo would say that it updated,
> but a subsequent reboot would not include my new kernel)

So I'm not the only one having this problem... I think I first saw this
with 2.5.68 but I'm not sure.

My boot partition is a small ext3 partition on a lvm2 volume accessed
over device-mapper (I've written a lilo patch for that, but the patch is
working and) but I don't think that has something to do with the
problem.

When syncing, unmounting and waiting some time after running lilo, the
changes sometimes seem correctly written to disk, I don't know when
exactly.

Could it be that the location of /boot/map is not written to the
partition sector of /dev/hda? Or not flushed correctly or something?

After reboot the old kernel came up again (though it was moved to
vmlinuz.old).

-- 
Christophe Saout <christophe@saout.de>


  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-09 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-09 19:04 [KEXEC][2.5.69] kexec for 2.5.69 available Andy Pfiffer
2003-05-09 20:04 ` Christophe Saout [this message]
2003-05-09 20:55   ` ext3/lilo/2.5.6[89] (was: [KEXEC][2.5.69] kexec for 2.5.69 available) Andy Pfiffer
2003-05-09 20:46     ` ext3/lilo/2.5.6[89] (was: [KEXEC][2.5.69] kexec for 2.5.69available) Riley Williams
2003-05-09 22:39       ` Joe Korty
2003-05-09 23:39       ` Andy Pfiffer
2003-06-11 22:08     ` ext[23]/lilo/2.5.{68,69,70} -- IDE Problem? Andy Pfiffer
2003-06-11 23:21       ` Christophe Saout
2003-06-11 23:40         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-06-12  0:20         ` ext[23]/lilo/2.5.{68,69,70} -- blkdev_put() problem? Andy Pfiffer
2003-06-12  0:29           ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-12 10:42             ` Christophe Saout
2003-06-12 10:54               ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-12 11:12                 ` Christophe Saout
2003-06-12 11:24                 ` ext[23]/lilo/2.5.{68,69,70} -- strace lilo - freeze Christophe Saout
2003-06-12 12:44                 ` ext[23]/lilo/2.5.{68,69,70} -- blkdev_put() problem? Herbert Xu
2003-06-12 17:27             ` Andy Pfiffer
2003-06-12 17:53               ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-12 18:03                 ` Andy Pfiffer
2003-06-12 18:10                   ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-12 18:53                     ` Christophe Saout
2003-06-12 18:25                   ` Andy Pfiffer
2003-06-13  8:01                     ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-13  9:57                       ` Herbert Xu
2003-06-13 14:42                       ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost
2003-06-13 17:17                       ` Andy Pfiffer
2003-06-13 22:12                       ` Unai Garro Arrazola
2003-06-13 22:28                         ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1052510656.6334.8.camel@chtephan.cs.pocnet.net \
    --to=christophe@saout.de \
    --cc=andyp@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.