From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Stilmant Subject: RE: transparent tcp proxy Date: 27 May 2003 11:49:35 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1054028975.18150.65.camel@stilmant> References: <09B04A55822EFF4DA48D2E0BB2941D4A019241@wardrive.citadelcomputer.com.au> <1053938722.17259.6.camel@stilmant> <1054024461.694.31.camel@elendil.intranet.cartel-securite.net> Reply-To: ml-netfilter@adtech.be Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1054024461.694.31.camel@elendil.intranet.cartel-securite.net> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 10:34, Cedric Blancher wrote: > What about a layer 2 SNAT on OUTPUT chain from B to A for filtered > packets ? > ebtables can achieve this. Well, I'll look in this solution. Thanks ... so you say it's possible to make a filter in ebtables where I can say for all frame for ip:A port X from port Y replace MAC with the #C value ? Michael