From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Subject: Re: Recent spam
Date: 05 Jun 2003 12:30:27 -0400
Message-ID: <1054830626.23132.169.camel@tiny.suse.com>
References: <3EDAEEBE.3050202@netscape.net>
	 <200306020833.40614.m.c.p@gmx.net> <1054538668.8091.8.camel@localhost>
	 <200306021859.39138.russell@coker.com.au> <3EDF450A.1060003@namesys.com>
	 <20030605145709.GM15761@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
	 <1054825912.23132.152.camel@tiny.suse.com>
	 <16095.24867.932302.642195@laputa.namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-14454-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <16095.24867.932302.642195@laputa.namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Nikita Danilov <Nikita@Namesys.COM>
Cc: Chris Dukes <pakrat@www.uk.linux.org>, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>, Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>, Soeren Sonnenburg <reiserfs@nn7.de>, reiserfs-list <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 11:26, Nikita Danilov wrote:
> Chris Mason writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
>  > 
>  > These two are unrelated.  SPAM is a fact of life on the internet, list
>  > admins have a responsibility to try and make things better for list
>  > subscribers, how well namesys meets is directly related to the quality
>  > of the list and its content.
> 
> Probably irrelevant, but I have spam assassin installed on my machine,
> and I see exactly zero spam coming from reiserfs list.

Same here (bogofilter), either one would have filtered the spam with or
without the tagging on the reiserfs list side.  The problem is how the
headers are stripped from the spam that is tagged by the mailing list. 
People that use automated spam reporting tools end up blaming namesys
instead of the actual sender.

-chris