From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Soeren Sonnenburg Subject: Re: Recent spam Date: 06 Jun 2003 11:02:52 +0200 Message-ID: <1054890172.1075.14.camel@localhost> References: <3EDAEEBE.3050202@netscape.net> <1054820341.23131.126.camel@tiny.suse.com> <3EDF5618.5090904@namesys.com> <200306060548.44154.russell@coker.com.au> <3EE04C02.2090707@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <3EE04C02.2090707@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Hans Reiser Cc: Alexander Lyamin , Russell Coker , reiserfs-list On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 10:08, Hans Reiser wrote: > Russell Coker wrote: > > >On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 00:39, Hans Reiser wrote: > > > > > >>Demidov's computer so that it can run with the case on it, etc. Giving > >>him the additional task of dealing with spamcop is just asinine. > >> > >> > > > >I hope you realise that you are proving the administrators of SpamCop to be > >correct. They believe that SPAM will only be accepted as a problem and dealt > >with if reacted to forcefully. Other services have nicer methods and don't > >get the results. > > > >After this issue has been discussed many times the only positive response I > >have received from you has been after using SpamCop. I conclude that I am > >correct to use it. > > > >No-one has asked the administrators of your mailing list to do anything > >special, just to refrain from doing unusual things. > > > >If you want a quick temporary fix then change the list address. The > >subscribers will be able to deal with it well enough (it's happened before) > >but the spammers will take some time to catch up. > > > > > > > Remove Russell from the list. In that case remove me too. Soeren.