From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262737AbTFOTTn (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2003 15:19:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262742AbTFOTTm (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2003 15:19:42 -0400 Received: from imladris.demon.co.uk ([193.237.130.41]:61312 "EHLO lapdancer.baythorne.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262737AbTFOTTm (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2003 15:19:42 -0400 Subject: Re: bad: scheduling while atomic! From: David Woodhouse To: Russell King Cc: Linux Kernel List In-Reply-To: <20030615181703.H5417@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20030615142950.A32102@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1055697278.1244.19.camel@lapdancer.baythorne.internal> <20030615181703.H5417@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1055705608.1244.40.camel@lapdancer.baythorne.internal> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5.dwmw2) Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 20:33:29 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 18:17, Russell King wrote: > Yes, although I was considering sending that one myself. If you're due > to do another sync up, feel free to include that. Well, given the 'NFTL aborts if add_mtd_blktrans functions exists, rather calling it and aborting only it it returns non-zero' bug, I suppose I am due such ;) -- dwmw2