From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham-oKK1aGe2n869koe0gwxAeg@public.gmane.org>
To: Ducrot Bruno <ducrot-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jan Rychter <jan-JAsPCFd0eodBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
ACPI List
<acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: 8259A initialization oops after resume
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 22:03:51 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1055844231.3126.24.camel@laptop-linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030617095829.GX19556-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Hi.
I've got a small patch in the latest swsusp version that disables
reinitialising the 8259A after swsusp. This seems to fix the issues
under 2.4.
Regards,
Nigel
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 21:58, Ducrot Bruno wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 02:00:00PM -0700, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > People are getting a particular kind of oops after resuming from S4
> > (implemented by swsusp). I'm posting this here, because the problem
> > seems not to be specific to swsusp.
> >
> > Hopefully some people on this list will know how and why the 8259A needs
> > to be initialized upon resuming from S4 and why it fails.
> >
> > The oops is reproducible -- one may do a number of suspend/resume cycles
> > without it, but once it appears, it will reappear on every subsequent
> > resume.
>
> This was done but with S4Bios in mind, not with S4 via swsusp, and is
> actually a (bad) hack, since that can not handle all cases.
> A better way is done under 2.5.
>
> Actually, there are many others troubles with
> 'echo 4 > /proc/acpi/sleep' and swsusp (fe, the devices are powered
> down twice, via ACPI _and_ swsusp), which is bad. Better is
> to use the swsusp own way to suspend, not via 'echo 4 > /proc/acpi/sleep'
> which is IMO broken.
>
> Under 2.5, the situation is different.
--
Nigel Cunningham
495 St Georges Road South, Hastings 4201, New Zealand
You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless,
Christ died for the ungodly.
-- Romans 5:6, NIV.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-17 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-15 21:00 8259A initialization oops after resume Jan Rychter
[not found] ` <m2ptlf3vlb.fsf-dTJq59+VGzkkCw8IV3R6h0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2003-06-17 9:58 ` Ducrot Bruno
[not found] ` <20030617095829.GX19556-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2003-06-17 10:03 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1055844231.3126.24.camel@laptop-linux \
--to=ncunningham-okk1age2n869koe0gwxaeg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ducrot-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jan-JAsPCFd0eodBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.