RE: Is this correct?

[Shawn <core@enodev.com>]

It wouldn't throw it away if it had a route for it, would it?

Since linux-router/eth1 has 10.0.0.250/24 assigned, wouldn't it forward
out that one?

On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 17:06, Daniel Chemko wrote:
> You have to bind 10.0.0.1 to the network interface, or else the OS may
> throw it away.
> 
> ip addr add dev eth0 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.<whatever>
> 
> Something like that.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn [mailto:core@enodev.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 2:07 PM
> To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Subject: Is this correct?
> 
> I have a, iptables statement I would just like someone to say if I have
> it right.
> 
> Let's say I have a linux box with eth0=10.0.0.250 and
> eth1=192.168.0.250, and there's a host (192.168.0.1) connected to eth1.
> I want to route connections from hosts in 10.0.0.0/24 land to 10.0.0.1
> onto the linux box's eth0, and have them NATed to 192.168.0.1
> 
> Will the following statement do that?
> 
> iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 10.0.0.1 -J DNAT \
> 	--to 192.168.0.1
> 
> 
>