From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: cpuspeed daemon Date: 23 Jun 2003 11:48:05 -0700 Sender: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <1056394085.5719.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1056238149.30963.394.camel@ixodes.goop.org> <1056238942.38e68448bf0bf@carlthompson.net> <1056346987.15249.21.camel@ixodes.goop.org> <1056393765.4cc7b6562be56@carlthompson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1056393765.4cc7b6562be56@carlthompson.net> Errors-To: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Carl Thompson Cc: cpufreq list On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 11:42, Carl Thompson wrote: > Great minds think alike. I almost picked "Speed Freq" as my new name before > settling on "Speed Daemon" ! Heh. I think the speed puns are inevitable with this kind of thing. > > > What does your daemon do? > > Pretty much the same thing except mine actually does make policy decisions > and does not yet have a sophisticated plugin infrastructure like yours. You must be thinking of something other project. I don't have a plugin infrastructure, and I'm hoping to never have one. I'm just trying to do a simple policy enforcement mechanism, on the grounds that there's plenty of other people doing policy setting daemon/user interfaces. J