From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: udpated data logging available Date: 25 Jun 2003 15:15:29 -0400 Message-ID: <1056568529.10097.135.camel@tiny.suse.com> References: <1055764071.24111.650.camel@tiny.suse.com> <1055944613.5545.22.camel@tiny.suse.com> <1056336342.5545.376.camel@tiny.suse.com> <200306231853.04098.christian.mayrhuber@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <200306231853.04098.christian.mayrhuber@gmx.net> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Christian Mayrhuber Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 12:53, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: > This patch does better than reiserfs-jh-1, though It didn't eat the data on my system. > I was unable to login as root (both tty and su) for about 2 minutes after system > boot with the -1 patch (data=ordered mode and root fs on software raid1). > > 2.4.21 + data_logging and 2.4.21+data_logging + reiserfs-jh-2 + io-stalls-logging-6 does not > show this behaviour. > > The quota patches seem to work with the experimental data logging stuff, too. > The system latency is bad during heavy io, but this could hold true for all of the 2.4.x kernel series. > You can try it yourself if you issue the command "dd if=/dev/zero of=tst bs=102400" in a shell and > now try to start another app. (I did this to test the user quota.) Thanks for giving things a try. I just uploaded io-stalls-7.diff, which should do better at fixing latency during heavy io. -chris