From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Leblond Subject: Re: Libipq and invalid packet_id Date: 26 Jun 2003 09:06:34 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1056611194.32622.20.camel@porky> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MqqLJ/NlmttBjyT1JaU1" Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: James Morris In-Reply-To: Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org --=-MqqLJ/NlmttBjyT1JaU1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le jeu 26/06/2003 =E0 02:40, James Morris a =E9crit : > On 26 Jun 2003, Eric Leblond wrote: > > - Is this a wanted feature ? >=20 > No. So I've got other related questions : - How is memory managed, ie what's happen if we queue a lot of packet without setting any verdict ? - In particular, what's happened if we do successive call to ipg_getmessage ? Do ipg_getmessage reuse address space after each call ? BR, --=20 Eric Leblond --=-MqqLJ/NlmttBjyT1JaU1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA++pt5nxA7CdMWjzIRAq2wAJ9T2qwbcIaLo5Pq/5eYb8B8jMCtJQCfZfhH S3rET0ONj75CLLyNgxazCiI= =XRes -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MqqLJ/NlmttBjyT1JaU1--