From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@clear.net.nz>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Jan Rychter <jan@rychter.com>,
swsusp-devel <swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: [Swsusp] 2.5 suspend.c changes ahead
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 23:20:31 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1058700016.1705.4.camel@laptop-linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030720111041.GA305@elf.ucw.cz>
Longer term, I don't want them to be entirely different beasts. Once I
get swapfile support working for 2.4, I have no plans for further
development. I plan that my next task will be to port it to 2.5/6, and
then begin to seek to merge it with Pavel, Andrew or whoever will take
patces as far as they are willing.
Regards,
Nigel
On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 23:10, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > I guess I'll do some big kernel/suspend.c changes tommorow. If you
> > > have some changes pending, please submit them within next 10 hours (I
> > > can't code while I sleep ;-). Pavel
> > >>
> > >> Looking forward!
> >
> > Pavel> Okay, I should start doing something.
> >
> > >> Swsusp for 2.4 is nearing 1.0.
> >
> > How is 2.5 swsusp going to be related to 2.4 swsusp? I am not sure I
> > understand the relationship -- it seems the two codebases have diverged
> > quite a bit?
> >
> > Is it going to be an entirely different beast?
>
> Entirely different beast.
> Pavel
--
Nigel Cunningham
495 St Georges Road South, Hastings 4201, New Zealand
You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless,
Christ died for the ungodly.
-- Romans 5:6, NIV.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-20 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-08 23:35 2.5 suspend.c changes ahead Pavel Machek
2003-07-09 2:43 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-09 11:59 ` [Swsusp] " Michael Frank
2003-07-09 18:18 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-09 19:28 ` [Swsusp-devel] " Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-13 5:08 ` Jan Rychter
2003-07-20 11:10 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-20 11:20 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2003-07-21 9:01 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1058700016.1705.4.camel@laptop-linux \
--to=ncunningham@clear.net.nz \
--cc=jan@rychter.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.