From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) Date: 23 Jul 2003 23:31:53 -0500 Message-ID: <1059021113.7911.13.camel@localhost> References: <3F1EF7DB.2010805@namesys.com> <3F1F6005.4060307@tupshin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <3F1F6005.4060307@tupshin.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Tupshin Harper Cc: Hans Reiser , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , reiserfs mailing list This is pretty f'ed, but it's on ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/tmp On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 23:26, Tupshin Harper wrote: > Hans Reiser wrote: > > > Please look at http://www.namesys.com/benchmarks/v4marks.html > > > > In brief, V4 is way faster than V3, and the wandering logs are indeed > > twice as fast as fixed location logs when performing writes in large > > batches. > > > > I am interested in testing this out, but the latest patch on the namesys > sight appears to be against 2.5.60 which was never usable on my > hardware. If there is a later patch, or if somebody has adapted it to > work against 2.6.0-test1(or anything comparably recent), please let me know. > > -Tupshin > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/