From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) Date: 24 Jul 2003 10:32:16 -0500 Message-ID: <1059060736.18049.2.camel@localhost> References: <3F1EF7DB.2010805@namesys.com> <3F1F6005.4060307@tupshin.com> <1059021113.7911.13.camel@localhost> <3F1F66F0.1050406@tupshin.com> <1059024090.9728.22.camel@localhost> <16159.48809.812634.455756@laputa.namesys.com> <3F1FF6DB.2090104@tupshin.com> <20030724152649.GB12647@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20030724152649.GB12647@work.bitmover.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Larry McVoy Cc: Tupshin Harper , Nikita Danilov , Hans Reiser , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , reiserfs mailing list Wow, it seems rather involved just to get a udiff against bk-cur. Pull kernel sources with reiser4 mods, then pull fs/reiser4/*, then generate a diff. Well, at least I understand it now... On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 10:26, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:10:19AM -0700, Tupshin Harper wrote: > > Nikita Danilov wrote: > > > > >Shawn writes: > > >> Looks like the 2.5.74 is the last one of any respectable size. I'm > > >> thinking someone forgot a diff switch (N?) over at namesys... > > >> > > >> Hans? Time to long-distance spank someone? > > > > > >Can you try following the instructions on the > > >http://www.namesys.com/code.html (requires bitkeeper)? > > > > > >Nikita. > > > > > I'm sorry, but I don't have a bitkeeper license. Please let me know if a > > fixed patch is available. > > If someone can tell me what it is that you need and I'll do it and send you > a patch. I'm cloning that tree now.