From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tim fitz Subject: quick question Date: 25 Jul 2003 12:08:40 -0700 Message-ID: <1059160120.17256.1065.camel@tfitz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hi everyone, This is Tim Fitz over at iParadigms (www.turnitin.com). We've been doing some more playing with reiser and it seems to be running pretty well, but every now and then our Dell PERC card seems to throw a tantrum and kill the machine. Well either way, we have been happy for a few months but now we are in the hole again. The machine is up but on two of our partitions we have errors. After running reiserfsck we got the messages below. I was wondering if there was any serious worries about trying to fix these errors with reiserfsprogs-3.6.10? Anything I should worry about? I know the --check happened with older utilities, but I just downloaded the 3.6.10... Anything I should worry about? Or is there any special thing I should do? Thanks alot!!! Tim -------------------------------------- rep1:~/reiserfsprogs-3.6.5-pre2/fsck # ./reiserfsck --check /dev/sdb1 <-------------reiserfsck, 2002-------------> reiserfsprogs 3.6.5-pre2 ************************************************************* ** If you are using the latest reiserfsprogs and it fails ** ** please email bug reports to reiserfs-list@namesys.com, ** ** providing as much information as possible -- your ** ** hardware, kernel, patches, settings, all reiserfsk ** ** messages (including version), the reiserfsck logfile, ** ** check the syslog file for any related information. ** ** If you would like advice on using this program, support ** ** is available for $25 at www.namesys.com/support.html. ** ************************************************************* Will read-only check consistency of the filesystem on /dev/sdb1 Will put log info to 'stdout' Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note need to type Yes if you do):Yes ########### reiserfsck --check started at Wed Jul 23 10:18:36 2003 ########### Replaying journal.. 0 transactions replayed Checking internal tree../ 1 (of 34)/119 (of 147)/ 80 (of 162)/ 60 (of 136)block 562318: The level of the node (0) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (562318), whole subtree is skipped / 2 (of 34)/ 16 (of 133)/ 40 (of 159)/114 (of 152)bad_leaf: block 1429700, items 4 and 5: The wrong order of items: [53184 4693494 0x1 DRCT (2)], [53184 4693495 0x1 DRCT (2)] /115 (of 152)block 1429701: The level of the node (3) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (1429701), whole subtree is skipped /116 (of 133)/ 52 (of 170)/ 34 (of 167)block 4228346: The level of the node (0) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (4228346), whole subtree is skipped / 3 (of 34)/ 55 (of 133)/ 98 (of 170)/168 (of 169)block 6338838: The level of the node (0) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (6338838), whole subtree is skipped /126 (of 133)/117 (of 170)/ 78 (of 169)block 8449305: The level of the node (0) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (8449305), whole subtree is skipped / 8 (of 34)/ 49 (of 86)/153 (of 170)/109 (of 164)bad_indirect_item: block 35031784: The item (125113 78494461 0x1 IND (1), len 4, location 2356 entry count 0, fsck need 0, format new) has the bad pointer (0) to the block (28235501), which is in tree already / 60 (of 86)/ 51 (of 170)/152 (of 162)bad_leaf: block 35463068, items 5 and 6: The wrong order of items: [125477 79460671 0x1001 DRCT (2)], [125477 79460672 0x1 DRCT (2)] /153 (of 162)block 35463069: The level of the node (30425) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (35463069), whole subtree is skipped / 12 (of 34)/168 (of 170)/ 86 (of 170)/154 (of 170)block 59632218: The level of the node (40122) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (59632218), whole subtree is skipped / 13 (of 34)/ 18 (of 170)/ 54 (of 170)/ 80 (of 169)block 60421583: The level of the node (45664) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (60421583), whole subtree is skipped / 14 (of 34)/153 (of 170)/ 6 (of 170)/165 (of 169)bad_indirect_item: block 72433096: The item [153420 168695575 0x1 IND (1)] has the bad pointer (0) to the block (4260207410) bad_indirect_item: block 72433096: The item [153420 168695576 0x1 IND (1)] has the bad pointer (0) to the block (1133521883) / 15 (of 34)/ 10 (of 170)/ 41 (of 170)/ 54 (of 167)block 73505462: The level of the node (20372) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (73505462), whole subtree is skipped / 13 (of 170)/ 4 (of 170)/ 75 (of 167)block 73616595: The level of the node (19986) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (73616595), whole subtree is skipped / 44 (of 170)/117 (of 170)/150 (of 168)block 74879572: The level of the node (15017) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (74879572), whole subtree is skipped / 16 (of 34)/ 53 (of 170)/ 55 (of 170)/103 (of 169)block 81849488: The level of the node (58986) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (81849488), whole subtree is skipped / 18 (of 34)/ 90 (of 170)/ 71 (of 170)/ 14 (of 170)block 96149585: The level of the node (2079) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (96149585), whole subtree is skipped / 98 (of 170)/ 55 (of 170)/ 90 (of 168)block 96447299: The level of the node (46106) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (96447299), whole subtree is skipped / 21 (of 34)/ 82 (of 170)/149 (of 170)/ 87 (of 170)block 108707229: The level of the node (51164) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (108707229), whole subtree is skipped /150 (of 170)/ 47 (of 170)/ 36 (of 169)block 111097021: The level of the node (2850) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (111097021), whole subtree is skipped /155 (of 170)/ 14 (of 170)/ 78 (of 170)block 111269980: The level of the node (35589) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (111269980), whole subtree is skipped / 22 (of 34)/ 29 (of 86)/ 67 (of 170)/ 65 (of 170)block 112942176: The level of the node (9706) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (112942176), whole subtree is skipped / 24 (of 34)/ 38 (of 170)/ 53 (of 170)/101 (of 170)block 120103820: The level of the node (30830) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (120103820), whole subtree is skipped /137 (of 170)/ 67 (of 170)/ 38 (of 168)block 123964496: The level of the node (28828) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (123964496), whole subtree is skipped / 25 (of 34)/ 2 (of 170)/164 (of 170)/155 (of 170)block 125380199: The level of the node (8152) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (125380199), whole subtree is skipped / 61 (of 170)/ 14 (of 170)/101 (of 170)block 127605491: The level of the node (61328) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (127605491), whole subtree is skipped / 32 (of 34)/ 33 (of 170)/ 51 (of 170)/120 (of 170)block 166100880: The level of the node (59985) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (166100880), whole subtree is skipped finished Comparing bitmaps..vpf-10640: The on-disk and the correct bitmaps differs. Bad nodes were found, Semantic pass skipped 25 found corruptions can be fixed only during --rebuild-tree ########### reiserfsck finished at Thu Jul 24 11:03:56 2003 ########### And then for the next partition: rep1:~/reiserfsprogs-3.6.5-pre2/fsck # ./reiserfsck --check /dev/sdb2 <-------------reiserfsck, 2002-------------> reiserfsprogs 3.6.5-pre2 ************************************************************* ** If you are using the latest reiserfsprogs and it fails ** ** please email bug reports to reiserfs-list@namesys.com, ** ** providing as much information as possible -- your ** ** hardware, kernel, patches, settings, all reiserfsk ** ** messages (including version), the reiserfsck logfile, ** ** check the syslog file for any related information. ** ** If you would like advice on using this program, support ** ** is available for $25 at www.namesys.com/support.html. ** ************************************************************* Will read-only check consistency of the filesystem on /dev/sdb2 Will put log info to 'stdout' Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note need to type Yes if you do):Yes ########### reiserfsck --check started at Thu Jul 24 12:50:31 2003 ########### Replaying journal.. 0 transactions replayed Checking internal tree../ 1 (of 38)/ 1 (of 134)/ 14 (of 170)/122 (of 170)block 12586: The level of the node (0) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (12586), whole subtree is skipped / 16 (of 170)/149 (of 170)block 12955: The level of the node (0) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (12955), whole subtree is skipped / 19 (of 170)/ 13 (of 170)block 13333: The level of the node (0) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (13333), whole subtree is skipped / 27 (of 134)/136 (of 170)/ 10 (of 170)block 38189287: The level of the node (33416) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (38189287), whole subtree is skipped /110 (of 134)/ 82 (of 170)/ 25 (of 170)bad_indirect_item: block 344764: The item (6856 1140155 0x1 IND (1), len 4, location 2096 entry count 0, fsck need 0, format new) has the bad pointer (0) to the block (19768492), which is in tree already / 30 (of 38)/132 (of 150)/ 35 (of 170)/ 20 (of 170)block 137322975: The level of the node (2978) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (137322975), whole subtree is skipped / 31 (of 38)/ 93 (of 151)/ 85 (of 170)/ 40 (of 170)block 141041249: The level of the node (18584) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (141041249), whole subtree is skipped / 36 (of 38)/ 83 (of 170)/167 (of 170)/168 (of 170)block 168706380: The level of the node (7700) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (168706380), whole subtree is skipped / 37 (of 38)/ 64 (of 86)/ 51 (of 170)/ 63 (of 170)block 173878258: The level of the node (0) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (173878258), whole subtree is skipped / 38 (of 38)/ 43 (of 85)/ 17 (of 170)/ 5 (of 170)block 176139253: The level of the node (14589) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (176139253), whole subtree is skipped / 44 (of 85)/ 37 (of 170)/ 81 (of 170)block 176178623: The level of the node (19543) is not correct, (1) expected the problem in the internal node occured (176178623), whole subtree is skipped finished Comparing bitmaps..vpf-10640: The on-disk and the correct bitmaps differs. Bad nodes were found, Semantic pass skipped 10 found corruptions can be fixed only during --rebuild-tree ########### reiserfsck finished at Thu Jul 24 22:37:40 2003 ########### rep1:~/reiserfsprogs-3.6.5-pre2/fsck #