From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Egger Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) Date: 26 Jul 2003 16:13:29 +0200 Message-ID: <1059228808.10692.7.camel@sonja> References: <3F1EF7DB.2010805@namesys.com> <1059062380.29238.260.camel@sonja> <16160.4704.102110.352311@laputa.namesys.com> <1059093594.29239.314.camel@sonja> <16161.10863.793737.229170@laputa.namesys.com> <1059142851.6962.18.camel@sonja> <1059143985.19594.3.camel@haron.namesys.com> <1059181687.10059.5.camel@sonja> <1059203990.21910.13.camel@haron.namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-VsYeRtbFWBv/fltru1uL" Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <1059203990.21910.13.camel@haron.namesys.com> List-Id: To: Yury Umanets Cc: Nikita Danilov , Hans Reiser , Linux Kernel Mailinglist , reiserfs mailing list --=-VsYeRtbFWBv/fltru1uL Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Sam, 2003-07-26 um 09.19 schrieb Yury Umanets: > I think this is more then enough for running reiser4. Reiser4 is a linux > filesystem first of all, and linux is able to be ran on even worse > hardware then you have. Linux is running just fine one the system, thanks. My question is whether reiserfs is suitable for flash devices. The chances to get some usable answers seem to be incredible low though... --=20 Servus, Daniel --=-VsYeRtbFWBv/fltru1uL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/IoyHchlzsq9KoIYRApkaAJ4m0vaU+xThl31eRHhrOdsYpitaMgCeMoWr yvmfUaTS8DkdY7Qd3cY4WA8= =hwAL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-VsYeRtbFWBv/fltru1uL--