From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Egger Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) Date: 27 Jul 2003 16:10:15 +0200 Message-ID: <1059315015.10692.207.camel@sonja> References: <3F1EF7DB.2010805@namesys.com> <1059062380.29238.260.camel@sonja> <16160.4704.102110.352311@laputa.namesys.com> <1059093594.29239.314.camel@sonja> <16161.10863.793737.229170@laputa.namesys.com> <1059142851.6962.18.camel@sonja> <1059143985.19594.3.camel@haron.namesys.com> <1059181687.10059.5.camel@sonja> <1059203990.21910.13.camel@haron.namesys.com> <1059228808.10692.7.camel@sonja> <3F23D38B.3020309@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mMC31r85lhnL5BalAJLE" Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <3F23D38B.3020309@namesys.com> List-Id: To: Hans Reiser Cc: Yury Umanets , Nikita Danilov , Linux Kernel Mailinglist , reiserfs mailing list --=-mMC31r85lhnL5BalAJLE Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Son, 2003-07-27 um 15.28 schrieb Hans Reiser: > it is suitable for any flash device that has wear leveling built into=20 > the hardware (e.g. all compact flash cards) Are you sure CF cards have wear leveling? I'm pretty confident that they have defect sector management but no wear leveling. There's a huge difference between those two. > or for which a wear leveling block device driver is used (I don't know > if one exists for Linux). This is normally done by the filesystem (e.g. JFFS2). --=20 Servus, Daniel --=-mMC31r85lhnL5BalAJLE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/I91Gchlzsq9KoIYRApAPAKC6nQ5wpfKGewY9esyRqhkzYUWFDQCg5VUe U7FjQAyfKtdn5AS9q2T5uPU= =yHsv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mMC31r85lhnL5BalAJLE--