All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Roger Larsson <roger.larsson@skelleftea.mail.telia.com>
Cc: Christian Vogel <vogel@skunk.physik.uni-erlangen.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-2.6.0-test2: Never using pm_idle (CPU wasting power)
Date: 31 Jul 2003 15:58:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1059692337.931.325.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200308010045.08178.roger.larsson@skelleftea.mail.telia.com>

On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 15:45, Roger Larsson wrote:

> This smells preemptive kernel, correct?

Doesn't look like anything specific to kernel preemption to me.

But if need_resched() is never zero, the while loop fails, and
schedule() _should_ be reached. So something is fishy here. Looking at
it the other way, however, if schedule() is never called, then
need_resched() will remain non-zero forever. Maybe you mean
need_resched() is never non-zero, i.e., it is always zero?

I think the problem is that there is a race between whatever you are
saying ACPI is doing with pm_idle and the setting of idle. Actually,
that is exactly what you are saying :)

Your fix smells exactly of that. Maybe have APCI set need_resched, so
the loop flips over again?

	Robert Love



  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-31 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-31 13:07 linux-2.6.0-test2: Never using pm_idle (CPU wasting power) Christian Vogel
2003-07-31 14:12 ` Charles Lepple
2003-07-31 14:44   ` Christian Vogel
2003-07-31 22:45 ` Roger Larsson
2003-07-31 22:58   ` Robert Love [this message]
2003-07-31 23:26     ` Robert Love
2003-07-31 22:59 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-01  9:18   ` Christian Vogel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1059692337.931.325.camel@localhost \
    --to=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roger.larsson@skelleftea.mail.telia.com \
    --cc=vogel@skunk.physik.uni-erlangen.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.