From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261521AbVFTTiT (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:38:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261551AbVFTTiO (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:38:14 -0400 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.193]:37511 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261530AbVFTTe6 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:34:58 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AGYFXGJWIT0fbTSfyEXs6Hz5J/rzEAiOUbGjyuNdb3gBcpGWwYy2PJCai30/zAVeYXHzPZbtK7czoAV0gQAW+GD5plAWj97to+xyug4p4DcIhfgx7nt3C/WE1po5WBSMp1ZplTszpkr09jv5lgXmtKDQLhPNKaNKN12tV0tLorw= Message-ID: <105c793f050620123413840b81@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:34:58 -0400 From: Andrew Haninger Reply-To: Andrew Haninger To: Nick Warne Subject: Re: 2.6.12 udev hangs at boot Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200506202000.08114.nick@linicks.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <200506181332.25287.nick@linicks.net> <42B6FBC7.5000900@pobox.com> <20050620173411.GB15212@suse.de> <200506202000.08114.nick@linicks.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/20/05, Nick Warne wrote: > It appears the issue people are seeing is with Slack 10, which shipped with > udev 0.26 - and I presume there was 'custom' rules Patrick had built in. I was going to point this out, but Slack 10.1 seems to have shipped with v0.50. While 10.1 would be thought to be an upgrade to 10.0, any experienced Slackware user knows that upgrades are discourages. So, you'd be very likely to find many Slackware 10 machines out there (actually, I still have v9.1 on one of my laptops). Anyway, something someplace obvious (e.g. a note in Changes in the area where it tells what minimum package versions are needed) would be helpful. -Andy