From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@rvs.uni-bielefeld.de>
To: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
Cc: Daryl Van Vorst <daryl@wideray.com>,
BlueZ Mailing List <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] RE: Rfcomm qualification
Date: 06 Aug 2003 00:04:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1060121068.962.15.camel@pegasus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20030805095818.0c229058@unixmail.qualcomm.com>
Hi Max,
> >The attached patch sets the default values for session and dlc credits
> >to zero and put in RFCOMM_MAX_CREDITS only if we receive a PN with 1.1
> >flow control.
> >
> >What do you think?
>
> I don't like this:
>
> @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@
> pn->ack_timer = 0;
> pn->max_retrans = 0;
>
> - if (d->credits) {
> + if (cr || d->credits) {
>
>
> This basically means that we'll always request CFC even if the other side
> explicitly told us that they don't support it. Which is kinda dumb :).
I know exactly what you mean and I don't like it either. But my general
purpose of this patch was not to introduce another "state" of credits.
And btw. credits is a uint at the moment.
What do you thing about using session->flags and once we received a
positive CFC acknowledgment we set a session wide flag?
> Here is what I would do (no time for the patch sory).
> When session is created set s->credits to -1. Replace above if() statement
> with
> if (s->credits < 0) {
I think only
if (s->credits != 0) {
will work in this case ;)
> Also rfcomm_apply_pn() needs to set d->credits only once at the end of the function.
This depends on how strict we want to go with the RFCOMM spec. It says
that if one dlc requests CFC all other dlc's should go with CFC, too. I
like to give the dlc the chance to deactivate or activate CFC even if
session default CFC setting says otherwise. But maybe this feature is
non-sense - I have to think about it in more detail.
Regards
Marcel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-05 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-29 20:58 Rfcomm qualification Daryl Van Vorst
2003-07-29 23:03 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2003-07-30 16:25 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-07-30 17:22 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2003-07-30 21:43 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-07-31 0:01 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-07-31 0:48 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-08-05 17:10 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-08-05 22:04 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2003-08-11 16:43 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-08-11 19:03 ` Marcel Holtmann
2003-08-14 17:39 ` Daryl Van Vorst
2003-08-14 17:48 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1060121068.962.15.camel@pegasus \
--to=marcel@rvs.uni-bielefeld.de \
--cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=daryl@wideray.com \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.