From: Paul Larson <plars@linuxtestproject.org>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ltp-results <ltp-results@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linstab@osdl.org
Subject: LTP nightly regression results for 2.6.0-test3-bk2,bk3,bk5,bk6,bk7,mm3,mjb1
Date: 20 Aug 2003 16:30:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1061415052.3909.1733.camel@plars> (raw)
Here's the latest batch of LTP test results for the latest 2.6 bk
snapshots and mm/mjb trees. These results and previous results are
archived at: http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/
Thanks,
Paul Larson
2.6.0-test3-bk1-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk2
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk1-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk2/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk1 2.6.0-test3-bk2 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N
getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N
nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N
setegid01 FAIL PASS N Y
swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
2.6.0-test3-bk2-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk3
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk2-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk3/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk2 2.6.0-test3-bk3 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N
getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N
gettimeofday PASS FAIL Y N
nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
syslog04 PASS FAIL Y N
*** bk4 failed to compile, but the failure was quickly fixed in bk5 ***
2.6.0-test3-bk3-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk5
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk3-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk5/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk3 2.6.0-test3-bk5 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N
getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N
gettimeofday FAIL PASS N Y
nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
syslog04 FAIL FAIL N N
2.6.0-test3-bk5-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk6
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk5-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk6/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk5 2.6.0-test3-bk6 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N
getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N
nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
syslog04 FAIL PASS N Y
2.6.0-test3-bk6-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk7
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-bk6-vs-2.6.0-test3-bk7/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-bk6 2.6.0-test3-bk7 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N
getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N
gettimeofday PASS FAIL Y N
nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
syslog04 PASS FAIL Y N
2.6.0-test3-mm2-vs-2.6.0-test3-mm3
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-mm2-vs-2.6.0-test3-mm3/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3-mm2 2.6.0-test3-mm3 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N
getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N
nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
2.6.0-test3-vs-2.6.0-test3-mjb1
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/ltp/results/2.6.0-test3-vs-2.6.0-test3-mjb1/
Test Name 2.6.0-test3 2.6.0-test3-mjb1 Regression Improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
alarm03 FAIL FAIL N N
getgroups03 FAIL FAIL N N
nanosleep02 FAIL FAIL N N
setegid01 FAIL PASS N Y
swapoff01 FAIL FAIL N N
swapoff02 FAIL FAIL N N
next reply other threads:[~2003-08-20 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-20 21:30 Paul Larson [this message]
2003-08-21 4:56 ` LTP nightly regression results for 2.6.0-test3-bk2,bk3,bk5,bk6,bk7,mm3,mjb1 George Anzinger
2003-08-21 9:25 ` George Anzinger
2003-08-25 16:11 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1061415052.3909.1733.camel@plars \
--to=plars@linuxtestproject.org \
--cc=linstab@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp-results@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.