From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: AthlonRob <AthlonRob@axpr.net>
Subject: Re: 2.4.21 Isn't working for me....
Date: 26 Aug 2003 12:43:47 -0700
Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk
Message-ID: <1061927026.14523.9.camel@localhost>
References: <1061872616.27076.47.camel@localhost>
	<20030826064747.GE10585@poupinou.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20030826064747.GE10585@poupinou.org>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk

On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 23:47, Ducrot Bruno wrote:

> The latest is again 2.4.22, _not_ 2.4.21.

That's the latest from the kernel.org repository, right?  the ones with
filenames like cpufreq-LINUX_2_4-20030825.tar.gz?

The codemonkeys ones, with filenames like cpufreq-2.4.21-1.gz are
against 2.4.21... right?  :-)

I would go ahead and just upgrade to 2.4.22, except I really need (ok, I
don't need, I just really want) preempt, low-latency scheduling, and the
latest NTFS drivers in this kernel... and 2.4.22 is still too new for
any of those to be available.  :-(

I suppose I could survive without cpu frequency scaling... but the
project looks *way super cool* to me.  :-)

Rob