From: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] M68k invalid vs. illegal
Date: 29 Aug 2003 09:17:54 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1062170273.20076.25.camel@spc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200308291451.h7TEp7BC005902@callisto.of.borg>
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 08:51, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> M68k: Use `invalid' instead of `illegal' (from Steven Cole in 2.5.x)
>
For the record, the original idea for these changes should be credited
to Richard B. Johnson via this post:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=105278255404767&w=2
Alan verified that Richard was right, and all I did was the grunt work.
Steven
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-29 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-29 14:51 [PATCH] M68k invalid vs. illegal Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-08-29 15:17 ` Steven Cole [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1062170273.20076.25.camel@spc \
--to=elenstev@mesatop.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.