From: Marc Schmitt <mschmitt@inf.ethz.ch>
To: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: nfs_statfs: statfs error = 116
Date: 18 Sep 2003 21:26:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1063913183.1553.25.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F69B7FB.1050505@RedHat.com>
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 15:49, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Marc Schmitt wrote:
>
> >
> > My questions are:
> >
> > - Is this a race?
>
> It sounds to me like it could be be a server issue under
> a very heavy load... How many nfsd are you running? Try
> increasing the number to see if that helps....
Thanks, I'm trying that and changed the number of nfsd from 32 to 64 on
the production system.
> > - How can I provide more debugging infos if needed?
>
> ethereal traces have more information and are
> generally more useful... imo...
I'll try to get a test setup running with the same software versions,
create a couple hundres of exports and bomb it from one of the our
clusters with bonnie++s. Like that I'll hopefully be able to reproduce
this re-exporting issue.
A user has found a bug that appears when checking out a big subversion
repository on the same server over NFS, it will always timeout upon this
huge amount of file manipulations and the checkout fails. He then
reproduced the issue with a small script that basicly loops over those
four commands:
rename ("old/bla", "new/bla")
stat("new,bla",..)
chmod("new/bla")
rename ("new/bla", "old/bla")
Before 1000 iterations the script returns: Error setting new/bla to
read-only! We'll try to narrow this down on the test cluster, too. One
particularity has been found already: the bug only appears if
the renaming takes place over directory boundries.
Regards,
Marc
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-18 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-18 9:56 nfs_statfs: statfs error = 116 Marc Schmitt
2003-09-18 13:49 ` Steve Dickson
2003-09-18 19:24 ` Bernd Schubert
2003-09-18 19:31 ` Marc Schmitt
2003-09-18 19:49 ` Bernd Schubert
2003-11-14 14:57 ` Marc Schmitt
2003-09-18 19:26 ` Marc Schmitt [this message]
2003-09-19 0:22 ` Neil Brown
2003-09-19 9:27 ` Marc Schmitt
2003-09-21 13:38 ` Marc Schmitt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-13 14:15 martin.knoblauch
2003-11-13 14:39 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-11-13 14:52 ` Martin.Knoblauch
2003-11-13 20:26 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-11-13 20:34 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-14 8:43 ` Martin.Knoblauch
2003-11-14 13:49 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-14 14:22 ` Martin.Knoblauch
2003-11-13 15:27 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-13 16:00 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-11-13 17:03 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1063913183.1553.25.camel@localhost \
--to=mschmitt@inf.ethz.ch \
--cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.