From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: AthlonRob Subject: Re: status pointer's problem with dmix. Date: 21 Sep 2003 10:06:46 -0700 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <1064164006.15525.6.camel@localhost> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 04:07, Clemens Ladisch wrote: > AthlonRob wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 11:52, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > is it through the rate plugin? > > > there was a bug about rate plugin together with dmix, which was fixed > > > recently on cvs. > > > > Is the 'rate' plugin == the 'plug' plugin? > > No. Yes. ;-) Well, the "plug" plugin uses the same code as the > "rate" plugin when converting the sample rate. I guess what I'm actually asking is.... I was unable to get the plug plugin working with the dmix plugin. Seperately, they both worked (although the dmix only with very few WAV files).... but together, they didn't work at all. They acted like the PCM was busy all the time, whenever audio was to be sent to them. Is this dmix/rate bug they recently fixed... going to fix my problem above, or is it an unrelated bug? -- Rob | If not safe, Jabber: athlonrob at axpr.net | one can never be free. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf