From: pete4abw@comcast.net (Peter Hyman)
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: I2C crash - ADM1021
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:24:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1065180667.10613.3.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1063901946.2937.27.camel@localhost>
Well, FWIW, removing the driver from loading still gives me valid info
from the it87 and lm90 that match the sensor readings from the mobo
bios. I can only assume that the implementation of the chip on my mobo
is non-standard or incorrect. Nonetheless, the reaction was SEVERE! I
felt it was worth reporting if for no other reason than to spare others
what occurred with me. Not to worry, I was fully backed up, so all I
lost was a little time!!!!!
Thanks for writing back.
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 07:22, Mark Studebaker wrote:
> this could simply be from chip reset or limit setting by the driver
> at initialization. This causes an ALERT output from the chip
> which the BIOS interprets as an overtemp and shuts the
> system down immediately.
>
> (another reason for init=0 being the default)
>
> But if the option line prevents the driver from accessing
> the chip at all, then this isn't the problem...
>
> Peter Hyman wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 14:00, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > > > Now, for the adm1021 problems, I'm puzzled. The option line in
> > > > > /etc/sensors.conf, as suggested by sensors-detect, prevents the
> > > > > driver from using any of the three addresses at which you have
> > > > > chipsets (0x18, 0x4c, 0x4e) so loading it shouldn't have had any
> > > > > effect.
> > >
> > > Now that I come to think of it again, one question: did you actually
> > > edit /etc/modules.conf as sensors-detect told you? Having failed to do
> > > so would explain (but not forgive) how adm1021 could cause trouble on
> > > your system.
> > >
> > Yes, I edited modules.conf exactly as suggested with the exclusions for
> > adm1021 listed.
> >
> > > > The only possible thing I was thinking was that in my
> > > > kernel config file, while no modules are loaded, there is one line
> > > > that is strange.
> > > >
> > > > CONFIG_I2C_MAINBOARD=y
> > >
> > > I never saw that option anywhere. Grep'ing linux 2.4.22 sources for it
> > > did not return anything. Could it be some Mandrake add-on?
> > >
> > > > is the only thing checked off.
> > >
> > > You mean checked *on*?
> > Yes, sorry.Selected. As I said, I think that is for a submenu to allow
> > for selecting modules for compilation or to be built in the kernel.
> > Saying N above would skip all the choices if using xconfig or menuconfig
> > to edit .config. I don't think it's a driver, but simply a group
> > selector.
> >
> > As I said, I am happy it works, but the failure of adm1021 remains a
> > mystery!
> >
> > Cheers!
> > --
> > Peter Hyman
> > Home:(609)395-1211 Office: (609)655-1184, Fax:(609)655-0285
> > Stop Telemarketers. Sign up for Do Not Call at http://donotcall.gov
> >
> >
> > Name: signature.asc
> > signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature
> > Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Peter Hyman
Home:(609)395-1211 Office: (609)655-1184, Fax:(609)655-0285
Stop Telemarketers. Sign up for Do Not Call at http://donotcall.gov
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 193 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20031003/f5a2e2d5/attachment.bin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-19 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-19 6:24 I2C crash - ADM1021 Peter Hyman
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Peter Hyman
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Peter Hyman
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Peter Hyman
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Peter Hyman [this message]
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Peter Hyman
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Peter Hyman
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Peter Hyman
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Peter Hyman
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Peter Hyman
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Peter Hyman
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1065180667.10613.3.camel@localhost \
--to=pete4abw@comcast.net \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.