From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pat LaVarre Subject: Re: zeroes read back more often than appended Date: 09 Oct 2003 14:54:42 -0600 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1065732882.5176.14.camel@patehci2> References: <1065553341.8172.45.camel@patehci2> <20031007204951.A25423@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from email-out2.iomega.com ([147.178.1.83]:14004 "EHLO email.iomega.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262560AbTJIUy7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 16:54:59 -0400 To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux_udf@hpesjro.fc.hp.com In-Reply-To: <20031007204951.A25423@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu> List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org This email you will see in both linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org and linux_udf@hpesjro.fc.hp.com Here forward you will see replies from me only in linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, per my interpretation of a polite request I kindly received offline. > Please ... I want volunteers to survey how widespread > this particular udf.ko miscompare is. > > Subject: Re: zeroes read back more often than appended > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=106555348100001 > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=106555346706222 >>From this quote you can see also offline I've enlisted friends to help survey how widespread this phenomenon is. The first friend so enlisted did see this same issue, in linux-2.6.0-test7 rather than -test6. Before tomorrow ends, from that friend I think we can hope to see such distinguishing details as: uname -msr dmesg | egrep 'MHz|bus|LOWM|^CPU#' Pat LaVarre