From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oren Held Subject: try tcp first; then udp Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 17:34:49 +0200 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <1067700887.5055.4.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 1AFxmE-0004hv-00 for ; Sat, 01 Nov 2003 07:34:58 -0800 Received: from 82-166-124-163.barak.net.il ([82.166.124.163] helo=fourbox.held.org.il) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AFxmD-0008Tq-L7 for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 01 Nov 2003 07:34:57 -0800 To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, I wonder if there's a way to mount an nfs share without specifying tcp or udp mount. I think that this is how Solaris behaves: it tries first tcp, if it's not good, then it tries udp. I've been looking for such a mount option and found none; I think it can be really useful when one has hetrogenous nfs servers (some use tcp, some use udp) - in the case I just want it to work and don't care which protocol it'll use. Is there a way to do it with the current kernel/mount versions? 10x - Oren ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs