From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Redeeman Subject: Re: some basic questions Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 16:44:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1068047082.32079.2.camel@redeeman.linux.dk> References: <1067880381.17873.9.camel@redeeman.linux.dk> <1068044839.32072.0.camel@redeeman.linux.dk> <3FA91326.2060407@gmx.net> Reply-To: redeeman@metanurb.dk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <3FA91326.2060407@gmx.net> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: ReiserFS List you say reiserfs and reiser4 is two diffrent things, is reiser4 a totally new filesystem? On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 16:11, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Redeeman wrote: > > nobody seems to answer :( > > > > On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 18:26, Redeeman wrote: > > > >>i am wondering about a few things. i am seriously thinking of change to > >>reiserfs. i experience bad stuff happen to fat32 often, and i have got > >>tired of it. i have a kernel with version 3.6 of reiserfs. > >> > >>will it be possible to convert to reiserfs4? > > Not at this time. Actually reiserfs 3.6 and reiser4 are two totally > different entities, so it's highly unlikely. > > >>is it possible to defragment a partition with reiserfs (or will it be in > >>version 4?) > > backup with tar, delete everything, restore backup. > > >>is it possible to undelete stuff? > > no. > > >>is it the correct choice for my use? (mp3, movies, cd images) > > should be. > > >>is there anything i should know? > > Yes. reiser4 is not yet stable. This will not affect you if you use > reiserfs 3.6 > > >>thanks, and have a nice day > > Regards, > Carl-Daniel -- Regards, Redeeman () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ - against microsoft attachments