From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>
Subject: Re: V4 stable enought ?
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 16:57:05 +0100
Message-ID: <1068307025.25267.5.camel@redeeman.linux.dk>
References: <.192.168.0.99.1068227408.squirrel@sml.dyndns.org>
Reply-To: redeeman@metanurb.dk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-16022-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <.192.168.0.99.1068227408.squirrel@sml.dyndns.org>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Reiserfs Mailinglist <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

hi, i was told it wasnt, but maybe it is :)
i have to wait till new year to get a new hd, i really hope its stable
there, else i am stuck with the old ones :/

On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 18:50, Thomas Graham wrote:
> does reiserfs4 stable enought now ?!
-- 
Regards, Redeeman
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail 
/\                        - against microsoft attachments